hey guys really hard to chose a best answer there all great but i have to go with love helping others so far because he supplyed the most details but theres still a few days also im mainly working with action fotos sorry for not putting that at first.
Answer
There isn't a lens that is best for the camera. The camera does not care. For as long as it's a Canon EF or EF-S mount, it will gladly take the lens and use it to the best of your abilities as a photographer.
You need to choose the lens that is best for you, as a photographer, and of course that fits the specific purpose for which you want to use it. Last but not least - it must be a lens you can afford. Some of the high end lenses easily run into 5 figure price tags!
Often more than one lens is needed for different tasks. However, there are some decent all around solutions. One such lens is Canon 18-200mm lens. It's a great all around lens that you can keep on your camera all vacation long and never have to change. This is very convenient. Of course being over 11x zoom, it's got its shortcomings. It won't be as sharp as primes or lower range zooms, and you are bound to some distortions here and there. Many many people though agree to put up with these shortcomings, because having just one do it all lens is very convenient.
If you want to go with smaller rang lenses, consider 18-55 and 55-200 lenses - cover the same range, weight and cost much less and will probably give a bit better performance. But you'll have to switch them around.
Want to do serious landscape or architecture work? Go wide. Something like 10 or 12mm on the wide side. Bird watching? Wildlife? Spying? A long telephoto, at least 300mm on the long end is in order. Portraits? Get a prime - 35mm or 50mm (no zoom). And so on. Sports? Concerts? You may want a fast telephoto - f/2.8 or so, but they are expensive...
So you really have to define the task to get a specific lens recommendations. Better yet, read some books about photography to get a decent idea of how lenses work, and you may actually be able to judge for yourself then.
LEM.
There isn't a lens that is best for the camera. The camera does not care. For as long as it's a Canon EF or EF-S mount, it will gladly take the lens and use it to the best of your abilities as a photographer.
You need to choose the lens that is best for you, as a photographer, and of course that fits the specific purpose for which you want to use it. Last but not least - it must be a lens you can afford. Some of the high end lenses easily run into 5 figure price tags!
Often more than one lens is needed for different tasks. However, there are some decent all around solutions. One such lens is Canon 18-200mm lens. It's a great all around lens that you can keep on your camera all vacation long and never have to change. This is very convenient. Of course being over 11x zoom, it's got its shortcomings. It won't be as sharp as primes or lower range zooms, and you are bound to some distortions here and there. Many many people though agree to put up with these shortcomings, because having just one do it all lens is very convenient.
If you want to go with smaller rang lenses, consider 18-55 and 55-200 lenses - cover the same range, weight and cost much less and will probably give a bit better performance. But you'll have to switch them around.
Want to do serious landscape or architecture work? Go wide. Something like 10 or 12mm on the wide side. Bird watching? Wildlife? Spying? A long telephoto, at least 300mm on the long end is in order. Portraits? Get a prime - 35mm or 50mm (no zoom). And so on. Sports? Concerts? You may want a fast telephoto - f/2.8 or so, but they are expensive...
So you really have to define the task to get a specific lens recommendations. Better yet, read some books about photography to get a decent idea of how lenses work, and you may actually be able to judge for yourself then.
LEM.
Why, in spite of all the advantages of the North over the South, did the Civil War last so long?
fuzzy19
Answer
The south had 2 great things going them
1) Better military leadership. They were able to take what they had and make it last
2) Spirit. Most of the fighting was in the Confederacy, these people were fighting for their homes and land. Think of how big home field advantage can be in sports.
3) Overconfidence on the part of the Union. Civilians came from DC to watch the first batle of Bull Run (or Mannesses Junction if you want to call it that). For these people it was entertainment to watch the Union "whip them rebels".
The south had 2 great things going them
1) Better military leadership. They were able to take what they had and make it last
2) Spirit. Most of the fighting was in the Confederacy, these people were fighting for their homes and land. Think of how big home field advantage can be in sports.
3) Overconfidence on the part of the Union. Civilians came from DC to watch the first batle of Bull Run (or Mannesses Junction if you want to call it that). For these people it was entertainment to watch the Union "whip them rebels".
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment